Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:23

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
The Aging Brain: 6 Things You Should Be Doing to Slow Cognitive Decline - CNET
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Should You Do Cardio or Weights First? We Finally Have an Answer. - ScienceAlert
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
United States roster at 2026 Olympics will differ from 4 Nations Face-Off, GM says - NHL.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How long does it typically take for prices to return to normal after tariffs are removed?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What thing happened to you as a child that you haven’t let go of to this day?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Who would win, an F-22 Raptor or Tie Defender?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?